ITL-01 CONSULTING SERVICE
Cloud Security
An offensive assessment of your cloud environment's security posture — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud — analyzed by specialists who have operated critical environments, not an automated scanner report.
The problem
Most cloud incidents are not born from exotic vulnerabilities, but from configuration: a permission that is too broad, a poorly scoped identity federation, a service exposed to the internet without need, a credential embedded in the code of a forgotten function. Posture management platforms generate thousands of alerts; what teams lack is knowing which of those findings, combined, form a real path to compromise.
How we work
Offensive multicloud posture assessment
A complete sweep of the environment — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud — using specialized enumeration and analysis tooling, followed by manual validation of every finding. The result is not a list of issues: it is the reconstruction of the attack paths that are actually viable in your environment, with proof of each link.
Deep identity and permission analysis
Mapping of privilege escalation paths, review of identity federations — including integrations with continuous integration and delivery platforms — and auditing of permission policies, where the real risk of the environment usually lives.
Detection of exposures and secrets at scale
Identification of unintentionally public resources (databases, replication services, network rules open to the internet) and of credentials embedded in code and compute functions, even in environments with hundreds of workloads.
Secure cloud-native architecture
Design and review of serverless and container architectures, landing zones, and multi-account foundations, with least privilege and segregation applied from the design stage.
Applied experience
Posture assessments conducted in production environments of high-volume digital operations and offshore oil and gas logistics companies, including environments with hundreds of serverless workloads and multi-account foundations.
Frequently asked questions
How is this assessment different from my posture management (CSPM) report?
Posture platforms list configuration deviations in isolation. Our assessment correlates the findings to reconstruct real attack paths — for example, how a permissive identity federation combined with a poorly written policy leads to administrative access — and prioritizes remediation by effective risk, not by the alert's generic severity.
Is the assessment intrusive? Is there any risk to the production environment?
The work is mostly read-only (enumeration of configurations and policies through the provider's interfaces), with scope and windows agreed by contract. We do not run destructive exploitation in production without explicit, formal authorization.
Do you cover all three major clouds?
Yes — AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, including multicloud and hybrid environments. The methodology is the same; the tooling and points of attention are specific to each provider.
Need a conversation about Cloud Security?
Describe the scenario in two lines. We'll answer with an honest read — including if the answer is that you don't need us.